Built for the field. Priced for the win.

Your bid is the
first thing
they judge.

Turn spreadsheet chaos into polished proposals that land in their inbox before the competitor's PDF even loads.

quote_v1_FINAL_use_this_one.xlsx
DESCRIPTION
QTY
UNIT
RATE
TOTAL
Structural Steel Framing
42
ton
$1,840
???
Concrete Foundation
380
cy
$195
???
Mechanical Rough-In
1
ls
$31,500
???
Electrical Conduit
2,400
lf
$4.20
???
Roofing Assembly
18,000
sf
$8.75
???
PROJECT TOTAL
$???
re: re: re: see below
From: mike.torres@torresconstruction.com
To: estimating@generalcorp.com
Subject: Quote for Job #2847 — re: re: re: see below

hey john — here's the numbers i ran. let me know if the markup looks off, i think i forgot the concrete pump rental again lol

also the steel prices are from like 3 weeks ago so probably add 8-12% idk

attached the excel but some of the cells are broken, just look at the highlighted ones

napkin_estimate_DO_NOT_SEND.jpg

steel ~ $77k?? maybe 80

concrete — check with rick

labor markup 22% or 25%

don't forget pump rental !!!!

elec — ask Dave

total ~$340k

total ~$360k (with contingency)

* need to send before friday

* check bond requirements

Scroll
The problem, plainly stated

Construction doesn't have a pricing problem.
It has a presentation problem.

Your numbers are right. Your crews are solid. But if the proposal looks like it was assembled at 11pm the night before — because it was — you're leaving jobs on the table.

The version control nightmare

quote_FINAL_v2_use_this_one_revised_ACTUAL_FINAL.xlsx. Every estimator has a folder that looks like this. When the GC calls asking for line 47, nobody knows which version they sent.

73%of contractors send the wrong version at least once per month

The forgotten line items

Concrete pump rental. Temporary power hookup. Dumpster fees. Change order markup. These aren't exotic — they're standard. But they disappear in the scramble, and you eat the cost.

$4,200average missed per proposal on jobs under $500K

Hours lost to reformatting

Your scope is solid. Your pricing is sharp. But you're spending Tuesday night dragging cells in Word, fighting tab stops, and wondering why the logo is pixelated again.

6.5 hrswasted per week on formatting, not estimating

The client perception gap

A GC choosing between two subs at equal price picks the one that looks like they run a tight operation. Your proposal is the only thing they see before the job starts.

2.4×more likely to win when proposal quality exceeds competitor's

Here's what the other column looks like.

Side by side

The difference is visible before you start typing.

Every row below is a real scenario from real contractors. The left column is where they started. The right is where they are now.

Without Bid
With Bid ✦
Speed
Proposal turnaround time
4–6 hours reformatting in Word/Excel
18 minutes from takeoff to PDF
Precision
Line-item accuracy
Cells break, formulas drift, numbers wrong
Every line auto-calculated, locked on send
Profitability
Markup consistency
Different markup per estimator, per job
Company-wide markup rules enforced by default
Scope Control
Change order tracking
Buried in email threads, often forgotten
Versioned, client-signed, auto-logged to job file
Perception
Client presentation quality
Plain-text email with attached spreadsheet
Branded PDF with cover, scope, pricing, terms
Revenue
Proposal win rate
Industry avg: 22% close rate
Bid users avg: 41% close rate
Operations
Template consistency
Estimator quits, takes all templates
Cloud library — team inherits everything
Field Use
Mobile access
Excel doesn't open right on iPhone
Full proposal review and edit on any device
Legal
Compliance & licensing
License numbers typed manually, sometimes wrong
Auto-populated from company profile on every proposal
41%
Average close rate for Bid users
18 min
Average proposal turnaround
$0
Missed line items on locked proposals
3,800+
Contractors on Bid
Interactive preview

This is what your client receives.

Select your trade, then click through the tabs. This is the actual output — not a mockup.

bid.app/proposals/2847/preview
LIVE PREVIEW
Torres Construction Co.
License #CA-B-449821 · Bonded & Insured
Formal Proposal · Confidential

Riverside Commercial Tower — Phase 2

Prepared for: Hartwell Development Group

Proposal Date
February 27, 2026
Valid Through
March 28, 2026
Proposal No.
#BID-2847
Total Value
$1,247,800
Construction site showing steel framing of a commercial building under blue sky
Riverside Commercial Tower
Build Your First Proposal FreeNo credit card. No templates to rebuild. Ready in 15 minutes.
General ContractorsElectrical SubsPlumbing ContractorsHVAC SpecialistsConcrete & MasonryRoofing CompaniesSteel FabricatorsDrywall & FramingPainting ContractorsLandscaping & Site WorkGeneral ContractorsElectrical SubsPlumbing ContractorsHVAC SpecialistsConcrete & MasonryRoofing CompaniesSteel FabricatorsDrywall & FramingPainting ContractorsLandscaping & Site Work

The next proposal you send
should be your best one.

Build your first proposal free — no templates to rebuild, no credit card, no estimator required. Just your scope, your numbers, and a PDF that wins.

Build Your First Proposal Free
See a sample proposal for your trade →No commitment. Pick your trade, see the output.
SOC 2 compliant
Bank-level encryption
Ready in 15 minutes
3,800+ contractors